@article {15409,
	title = {New Curculionidae, with notes on synonymy},
	journal = {Annals and Magazine of Natural History},
	volume = {(10) 6},
	year = {1930},
	pages = {551-577},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {Baryopadus [Zoology / / distinct gen. p. 558]. Cratopechus arundinarum [Zoology / / ] [ / / ]. Cryptorrhynchus [Zoology / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ]. Insecta [Migration / / Insalar (including New Zealand) Marquesas Is. Rhyncogonus navicularis sp. n. (Cure.)]. Listroderes [Zoology / / Schh. (=Hyperoides  Mshl) p. 574]. Lixus bidentatus [Zoology / / Klb. (=Lixus roccattii Camerano) p. 574].Lyparopais [Zoology / / in subfam. Tanyrhinchinae p. 559].Nemestra [Zoology / / placed in subfam. Tanyr-rhynehinae p. 559].Oreoscotus [Zoology / / in Anthonominae p. 574].Platypterocis [Zoology / / in Otiorrhynchinae p. 573].Polydius [Zoology / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ].Rhyncogonus navicularis [Migration / / ].SolenorrhinusStramia [Zoology / / restored to Tanyrrhynchinae p. 559].Strongylorrhinus clarki [Zoology / / Aru Is Australia And Tasmania sp. n. (Curc.)].Xestorrhinus [Zoology / / [Xenorrhinus in error]Xestorrhinus costatus sp. n Uganda p. 556 fig].Insecta.Apion arabicum (Apionidae).Apion ceylonicum - Gerst. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion cingalense - Wlk. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion shinghalense - Wagn. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion singhalensis - Hllr. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion standfussi - Wagn. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion stigma (Apionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sudan p. 562, Apionzizyphi, Mshl., (=, Apion standfussi, Wagn., ), Apion arabicum, new toSudan p. 563, Apion ceylonicum, Gerst., (=, Apion cingalense, Wlk.,Apion singhalensis, Hllr., Apion shinghalense, Wagn., ) p. 575].Apion zizyphi - Mshl. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Echinapoderus horridus - Boh. (Attelabidae): [Systematics].Echinapoderus kilimanus - Aur. (Attelabidae): [Systematics, distinctfrom, Echinapoderus horridus, Boh., (=, Echinapoderus schroderi, Voss,) p. 575].Echinapoderus schroderi - Voss (Attelabidae): [Systematics].Acatus (Curculionidae): [Gen nov, gen. n., (Menemaehinae) p. 567,Acatus rhombicus, (with, subsp. n., Acatus natalensis, Natal p. 570),sp. n., Zimbabwe, Portu-guese E. Africa p. 568 fig., [Subsp nov, Spnov]].Acatus natalensis (Curculionidae).Acatus rhombicus (Curculionidae).Acicnemis (Camptorrhinus) reversus - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics, (=, Acicnemis arcuferus, Chev., ), Acicnemis frenata,Pasc., (=, Acicnemis dohrni, Huben., ), Acicnemis stilata, n. n., for,Acicnemis frenata, Hub., nec Pasc., Acicnemis triangulum, Huben., necPasc. distinct from, Semelima triangulum, Pasc., p. 575, Acicnemisfalsa, n. n., for, Acicnemis peduncularis, Huben., nec Pasc. p. 576].Acicnemis arcuferus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis dohrni - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis falsa (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Acicnemis frenata - Hub. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis frenata - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis peduncularis - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis stilata (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Acicnemis triangulum - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Aedophronus - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Mimaulodes,Mshl., ), Aedophronus pretoriensis, sp. n., S. Africa p. 551].Aedophronus pretoriensis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].Alcides saundersi - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Alcidescarbonarius, Pasc, ), Alcides australis, Boisd., (=, Alcidesprofiuens, Pasc, ), Alcides latefasciatus, Chev., [female] (=, Alcidessimus, Chev., ), Alcides lixiformis, Mshl., (=, Alcides maynei, Hust.,) p. 575].Amphialus com-municans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Amphialus discriminans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Amphialuscom-municans, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Aporimus (Curculionidae): [Gen nov, gen. n., for, Cneorrhinusviridanus, Boh., (type), Cneorrhinus languidus, Boh., Cneorrhinusoblongus, Boh., p. 558].Apotomorrhinus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Eodinus,Fst., ), Apotomorrhinus cribratus, Boh., (=, Apotomorrhinus fuscus,Fst., ) p. 576].Apotomorrhinus alboater - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Apotomorrhinus cribratus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Apotomorrhinus fuscus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Balaninus calbum - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Apotomorrhinus alboater, Wlk., ) p. 576].Baris signatus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Mecinusrelictus, Wlk., ) from, Apotomorrhinus, p. 576].Baryopadus (Curculionidae).Brachyceropsis - Auriv. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Xenostes,Simps., ), Brachyceropsis verrucosa, F., (=, Brachyceropsis jamesoni,Simps., ) p. 574].Brachyceropsis jamesoni - Simps. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachyceropsis verrucosa - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus acerbus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus annulatus - Gerst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus atrox - Gerst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus capito - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus crispatirostris - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus cristatus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus detritus - Thunb. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus dorsomaculatus - Qued. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus ebullinus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus erinaceus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus fascicularis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus fasciculosus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gemmatus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gemmifer - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gryphus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus honorabilis - Brancsik (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus inaequalis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus inaequalis - Thunb. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus indutus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus intutus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Brachycerus acerbus, Gyll., ), Brachycerus scutirostris, Gyll., (=,Brachycerus crispatirostris, Gyll., ), Brachycerus fascicularis, Ol.,(=, Brachycerus cristatus, Per., ), Brachycerus capito, Pasc.,distinct from, Brachycerus stellaris, Ol., Brachycerus inaequalis,Ol., (=, Brachycerus dorsomaculatus, Qued., ) distinct from,Brachycerus tauriculus, Sparrm., Brachycerus thunbergi, Gyll., (=,Brachycerus inaequalis, Thunb., nec Ol.), Brachycerus zeyheri, Gyll.,(=, Brachycerus ebullinus, Per., ), Brachycerus atrox, Gerst., (=,Brachycerus gryphus, Pasc., ), Brachycerus annulatus, Gerst., (=,Brachycerus honorabilis, Brancsik, ), Brachycerus indutus, Per., (=,Brachycerus loquax, Hartm., ), Brachycerus margaritaceus, Germ.,distinct from, Brachycerus tuberosus, Wied., Brachycerus strumosus,Pasc., (=, Brachycerus mamillatus, Aur., ), Brachycerus vestitus,Gyll., (=, Brachycerus piger, Gyll., ), Brachycerus detritus, Thunb.,(=, Brachycerus pustulosus, Gyll., ), Brachycerus tauriculus, Sparrm.,(=, Brachycerus reflezus, Gyll., Brachycerus nebulosus, Ol., ) p. 573,Brachycerus variolosus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus rugipes, Gyll., ),Brachycerus fasciculosus, Germ., (=, Brachycerus setiger, Gyll., ),Brachycerus gemmatus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus tuberosus, Wied., ),Brachycerus gemmifer, Germ., (=, Brachycerus ulcerosus, Gyll., ),Brachycerus erinaceus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus varius, Per., ) p. 574].Brachycerus loquax - Hartm. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus mamillatus - Aur. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus margaritaceus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus nebulosus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus piger - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus pustulosus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus reflezus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus rugipes - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus scutirostris - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus setiger - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus stellaris - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus strumosus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus tauriculus - Sparrm. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus thunbergi - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus tuberosus - Wied. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus ulcerosus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus variolosus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus varius - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus vestitus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus zeyheri - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Calandra oryzae - L. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Cossonusquadnmacula, Wlk., ) p. 577].Calandra porcata (Curculionidae).Camptorrhmus notabilis - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Cholus (Curculio) spinipes - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cholus wattsi, Mshl., ) p. 574].Cholus wattsi - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus languidus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus oblongus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus viridanus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes - Schonh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Aryplaeus,Pasc., type, Colobodes suturalis, Pasc., ), Colobodes bilbergi, Boh.,(=, Colobodes pustulosus, Pasc., ) p. 566].Colobodes bilbergi - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes pustulosus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes suturalis - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Coptorhamphus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cosmopolites sordidus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus cribricollis, Wlk., ) p. 576].Cossonus quadnmacula - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cratopechus arundinarum (Curculionidae).Cratopechus gedyei (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Kenya p. 563,Cratopechus arundinarum, amended measurements p. 565 fig.].Cryptorrhyachus mangiferae - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cryptorrhyachus ineffectus, Wlk., ), Cryptorrhyachusfasciculaticollis, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Cryptorrhynchus (Curculionidae).Cryptorrhynchus fasciculaticollis - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics].Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cryptorrhynchus mangiferae - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus, Wlk., ), Cryptorrhynchusfasciculaticollis, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Cydianerus (Curculionidae).Cydianerus alrox (Curculionidae).Cydianerus argenteus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics,Systematics, (=, Polydius donceli, Bovie, ), Cydianerus pascoei,Bovie, from, Polydius, p. 572, Cydianerus alrox, see, Polydius, (=,Polydius donceli, Bovie, ), Cydianerus pascoei, Bovie, from, Polydius,p. 572, Cydianerus atrox, see, Polydius].Cydianerus atrox (Curculionidae).Cydianerus pascoei - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus callosus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus ciliatus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus congoanus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus k. - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus kamerunicus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus maynei - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus plagiatus - Fhs. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Derelomus ciliatus, Hust., ), Derelomus subvittatus, Fst., [male] (=,Derelomus maynei, Hust., ), Derelomus kamerunicus, Fst., [male] (=,Derelomus callosus, Hust., ), Derelomus k., Fst., [female] (=,Derelomus congoanus, Hust., ) p. 575].Derelomus subvittatus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus - Lac. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Marmarochelus,Desbr., ), Ectatorrhinus porosus, Wlk., (=, Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni,Desbr., ), Ectatorrhinus trinarius, Pasc., (=, Ectatorrhinus nanus,Hllr., ), Ectatorrhinus galeotes, Pasc., (=, Ectatorrhinus conifer,Hllr., ) from, Aryptaeus, p. 566].Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni - Desbr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus conifer - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus galeotes - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus nanus - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus porosus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus trinarius - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Elytrurus subvittatus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Elytrurus horizontalis, Fairm., ) p. 573].Embrithes cirricollis - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Embrithesmulticarinatus, Boh., from, Siteutes, p. 573].Embrithes multicarinatus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus arrogans - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Systematics,(=, Entimus phbeius, Roel., ), Entimus granulatus, L., (=, Entimusspeciosus, Er., ) p. 572, (=, Entimus plebeius, Roel., ), Entimusgranulatus, L., (=, Entimus speciosus, Er., ) p. 572].Entimus granulatus - L. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus phbeius - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus plebeius - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus speciosus - Er. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Hyperoides - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Listroderes (Curculionidae).Lixus bidentatus (Curculionidae).Lixus roccattii - Camerano (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Lobotrachelus coffeae (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sudan p. 566].Lophobaris piperis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sumatra p. 370].Lyparopais (Curculionidae).Mecinus relictus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecistocerus assimilans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics,Mecistocerus declaratus, Wlk., from, Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Mecistocerus declaratus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus helleri (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Mecopus ludovid - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus serrirostris - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus serrirostris - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Mecopus ludovid, Hllr., ), Mecopus helleri, n. n., for, Mecopusserrirostris, Hllr., nec Pasc. p. 576].Myocalandra exarata - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus exquisitus, Wlk., Calandra porcata, Pasc.) p. 577].Nemestra (Curculionidae).Niphades vexalus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Odoiporus longicollis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus glabridiscus, Wlk., ) p. 576].Omotemnus (Rhynchophorus) introducens - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics, (=, Omotemnus ceylanensis, Roel., ) p. 577].Omotemnus ceylanensis - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Oreoscotus (Curculionidae).Parasystates hancocki (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].Parasystates subconvexus - Aur. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, type ofgen. p. 556, Parasystates hancocki, sp. n., Uganda p. 555].Phloeophagus marginalia (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Uganda p.571].Phylaitis panops - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Sphenophorus, p. 576].Platypterocis (Curculionidae).Polydius - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Polytelidius,Bovie, Polydius coelestinus, Perty, (=, Polydius orbigynyi, Chev., ),Polydius atrox, Germ. from, Cydianerus, p. 572].Polydius atrox (Curculionidae).Polydius coelestinus - Perty (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polydius donceli - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polydius orbigynyi - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polytelidius - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Psilosomus (Cossonus) hebes - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Psilosomus opacus, Woll., ) p. 577].Psilosomus opacus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus brunneus - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus tribuloides - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus tribuloides - Pall. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Rhigusbrunneus, Bovie, ), Rhigus vespertilio, Pasc., [male] (=, Rhigustribuloides, Bovie, nec Pall.) p. 572].Rhigus vespertilio - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhyncogonus navicularis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., MarquesasIs. p. 553].Saphorrhynchus - Sharp (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Heteraomus,Broun, ), Saphorrhynchus longicornis, Sharp, (=, Saphorrhynchusargenlatus, Broun, ) p. 574].Saphorrhynchus argenlatus - Broun (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Saphorrhynchus longicornis - Sharp (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Sciobius - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Siteutes, Schh.,type, Sciobius albicinctus, Boh., ) p. 572].Sciobius albicinctus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Seleuca - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Coptorhamphus,Woll., Hylobiinae), Seleuca strangulatus, Woll., (=, Seleuca linearis,Mshl., ) p. 574].Seleuca linearis - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Seleuca strangulatus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Sipalus hypocrita - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Sipalustinctus, Wlk., ) p. 577].Sipalus tinctus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Solenorrhinus (Curculionidae).Spermologus - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Tiphaura,Pasc., ) p. 574, Spermologus funesta, Pasc., (=, Spermologusbreviscapus, Mshl., ) p. 575].Spermologus breviscapus - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Spermologus funesta - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Stramia (Curculionidae).Strongylorrhinus clarki (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Australia p.559, Strongylorrhinus ochraceus, further description p. 560].Strongylorrhinus ochraceus (Curculionidae).Tetracyphus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Neiphagus,Pasc., ), Tetracyphus odontomus, Chev., (=, Tetracyphus fascicularis,Pasc., ) p. 576].Tetracyphus fascicularis - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Tetracyphus odontomus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Tiphaura - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Xenorrhinus (Curculionidae).Xenostes - Simps. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Xestorrhinus (Curculionidae).Xestorrhinus costatus (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].},
	keywords = {Acatus, Acatus natalensis, Acatus rhombicus, Acicnemis (Camptorrhinus) reversus, Acicnemis arcuferus, Acicnemis dohrni, Acicnemis falsa, Acicnemis frenata, Acicnemis peduncularis, Acicnemis stilata, Acicnemis triangulum, Aedophronus, Aedophronus pretoriensis,, Alcides, Alcides australis, Alcides carbonarius, Alcides latefasciatus, Alcides lixiformis, Alcides maynei, Alcides saundersi, Alcides simus, Amphialus communicans, Amphialus discriminans, Apion arabicum, Apion ceylonicum, Apion cingalense, Apion shinghalense, Apion standfussi, Apion stigma, Apion zizyphi, Aporimus, Apotomorrhinus, Apotomorrhinus alboater, Apotomorrhinus cribratus, Apotomorrhinus fuscus, Aryplaeus, Aryptaeus, Balaninus calbum, Baris signatus, Baryopadus, Brachyceropsis, Brachyceropsis jamesoni, Brachyceropsis verrucosa, Brachycerus acerbus, Brachycerus annulatus, Brachycerus atrox, Brachycerus capito, Brachycerus crispatirostris, Brachycerus cristatus, Brachycerus detritus, Brachycerus dorsomaculatus, Brachycerus ebullinus, Brachycerus erinaceus, Brachycerus fascicularis, Brachycerus fasciculosus, Brachycerus gemmatus, Brachycerus gemmifer, Brachycerus gryphus, Brachycerus honorabilis, Brachycerus inaequalis, Brachycerus indutus, Brachycerus intutus, Brachycerus loquax, Brachycerus mamillatus, Brachycerus margaritaceus, Brachycerus nebulosus, Brachycerus piger, Brachycerus pustulosus, Brachycerus reflezus, Brachycerus rugipes, Brachycerus scutirostris, Brachycerus setiger, Brachycerus stellaris, Brachycerus strumosus, Brachycerus tauriculus, Brachycerus thunbergi, Brachycerus tuberosus, Brachycerus ulcerosus, Brachycerus variolosus, Brachycerus varius, Brachycerus vestitus, Brachycerus zeyheri, Calandra porcata, Camptorrhmus notabilis, Cholus spinipes, Cholus wattsi, Cneorrhinus languidus, Cneorrhinus oblongus, Cneorrhinus viridanus, Colobodes, Colobodes bilbergi, Colobodes pustulosus, Colobodes suturalis, Coptorhamphus, Cosmopolites sordidus, Cossonus quadnmacula, Cratopechus arundinarum, Cratopechus gedyei, Cryptorhynchus, Cryptorrhyachus fasciculaticollis, Cryptorrhyachus ineffectus, Cryptorrhynchus fasciculaticollis, Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus, Cydianerus, Cydianerus alrox, Cydianerus argenteus, Cydianerus atrox, Cydianerus pascoei, Derelomus, Derelomus callosus, Derelomus ciliatus, Derelomus congoanus, Derelomus kamerunicus, Derelomus maynei, Derelomus plagiatus, Derelomus subvittatus, Desmidophorus, Echinapoderus horridus, Echinapoderus kilimanus, Echinapoderus schroderi, Ectatorrhinus, Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni, Ectatorrhinus conifer, Ectatorrhinus galeotes, Ectatorrhinus nanus, Ectatorrhinus porosus, Ectatorrhinus trinarius, Elytrurus horizontalis, Elytrurus subvittatus, Embrithes cirricollis, Embrithes multicarinatus, Entimus arrogans, Entimus granulatus, Entimus plebeius, Entimus speciosus, Eodinus,, Heteraomus, Hyperoides, Listroderes, Lixus bidentatus, Lixus roccattii, Lobotrachelus coffeae, Lophobaris piperis, Lyparopais, Marmarochelus,, Mecinus relictus, Mecistocerus assimilans, Mecistocerus declaratus, Mecopus helleri, Mecopus ludovid, Mecopus serrirostris, Mimaulodes, Myocalandra exarata, Neiphagus,, Nemestra, Niphades vexalus, Odoiporus longicollis, Omotemnus ceylanensis, Omotemnus introducens, Oreoscotus, Parasystates hancocki, Parasystates subconvexus, Phloeophagus marginalia, Phylaitis panops, Platypterocis, Polydius, Polydius atrox, Polydius coelestinus, Polydius donceli, Polydius orbigynyi, Polydius,, Polytelidius, Psilosomus hebes, Psilosomus opacus, Rhigus brunneus, Rhigus tribuloides, Rhigus vespertilio, Rhyncogonus navicularis, Saphorrhynchus, Saphorrhynchus argenlatus, Saphorrhynchus longicornis, Sciobius, Sciobius albicinctus, Seleuca, Seleuca linearis, Seleuca strangulatus, Semelima triangulum, Sipalus hypocrita, Sipalus tinctus, Siteutes, Sitophilus oryzae, Solenorrhinus, Spermologus, Spermologus breviscapus, Spermologus funesta, Sphenophorus, Sphenophorus cribricollis, Sphenophorus exquisitus, Sphenophorus glabridiscus, Sternochetus mangiferae, Stramia, Strongylorrhinus clarki, Strongylorrhinus ochraceus, Tetracyphus, Tetracyphus fascicularis, Tetracyphus odontomus, Tiphaura, Xenorrhinus, Xenostes, Xestorrhinus, Xestorrhinus costatus},
	author = {Marshall, Sir G.}
}
@article {15238,
	title = {Effect of allylisothiocyanate on Sitophilus oryzae, Tribolium confusum and Plodia interpunctella: Toxicity and effect on insect mitochondria},
	journal = {Crop Protection},
	volume = {33},
	year = {2012},
	month = {Mar},
	pages = {40-51},
	abstract = {Allylisothiocyanate is a volatile chemical used for insect fumigation. Because its mode of action is not fully understood, the insecticidal efficacy of AITC was investigated using dry and wet-table applications on the major stored-product insects Sitophilus oryzae (L), Plodia interpunctella (Hubner), and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin Du Val. The LC50 values 72 h after fumigation with AITC against S. oryzae adults, P. interpunctella larvae, T. confusum adults and T. confusum larvae were 2.0, 2.2, 3.7, and 4.7[mu]l L-1 air, respectively. The complete mortality (100\%) of all four insect pests was recorded after a 72-h exposure to AITC fumes at an atmospheric concentration of 11.5 [mu]l L-1 air, with results similar to those found with insects exposed to a recommended 5 mg L-1 dose of phosphine. No differences were detected between the effects of AITC and PH3 on the morphology of mitochondria taken from the midgut and integument epithelial cells of treated T confusum 3rd instar larvae. Rarefaction and vacuolization of the mitochondrial matrix were evident. The quantity of cristae and density of the electron matrix were also reduced. AITC has potential as a biodegradable and safe insect fumigant. The mitochondria alteration confirms the insecticidal effect of AITC, which may act on the respiratory system. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0261-2194},
	author = {Mansour, Eltayeb E. and Mi, Fengyu and Zhang, Guoan and Xie, Jiugao and Wang, Yongmo and Kargbo, Abu}
}
@article {15232,
	title = {Acoustic Indicators for Targeted Detection of Stored Product and Urban Insect Pests by Inexpensive Infrared, Acoustic, and Vibrational Detection of Movement},
	journal = {Journal of Economic Entomology},
	volume = {103},
	number = {5},
	year = {2010},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {1636-1646},
	abstract = {Crawling and scraping activity of three stored-product pests, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), and Stegobium paniceum (L.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae), and two urban pests. Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae) and Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), were monitored individually by infrared sensors, microphones, and a piezoelectric sensor in a small arena to evaluate effects of insect locomotory behavior and size on the ability of an inexpensively constructed instrument to detect insects and distinguish among different species. Adults of all species could be detected when crawling or scraping. The smallest insects in the study, first-fourth-instar C. lectularius nymphs, could not be detected easily when crawling, but could be detected when scraping. Sound and vibration sensors detected brief, 3-10-ms impulses from all tested species, often grouped in distinctive trains (bursts), typical of impulses in previous acoustic detection experiments. To consider the potential for targeting or focusing detection on particular species of interest, indicators were developed to assess the likelihood of detection of C. lectularius. Statistically significant differences were found between C. lectularius and other species in distributions of three measured variables: infrared signal durations, sound impulse-burst durations, and sound pressure levels (energy) of impulses that best matched an averaged spectrum (profile) of scraping behavior. Thus, there is potential that signals collected by an inexpensive, polymodal-sensor instrument could be used in automated trapping systems to detect a targeted species, 0.1 mg or larger, in environments where servicing of traps is difficult or when timeliness of trapping information is important.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0022-0493},
	author = {Mankin, R. W. and Hodges, R. D. and Nagle, H. T. and Schal, C. and Pereira, R. M. and Koehler, P. G.}
}
@article {15196,
	title = {Prey Preferences of Evarcha flavocincta and Plexippus petersi (Araneae: Salticidae) from Malaysia},
	journal = {Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences},
	volume = {3},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {January},
	pages = {105-109},
	abstract = {Two jumping spiders, Plexippus petersi and Evarcha flavocincta (Araneae: Salticidae) were chosen for a test of prey preference from several species of spiders commonly found in University Putra Malaysia (UPM) Serdang, Malaysia campus. Test spiders were maintained in captivity on diet of early stage larvae of Tenebrio molitor (mealworm beetle) and midges, Chironomus sp. For testing, adult mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse), fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) and rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) were used. Two types of tests using living prey were employed, i.e. simultaneous-presentation tests (two types of prey provided at the same time) and alternate-day tests (different types of prey provided on successive days). All level of significance was determined at = 0.05 using a statistical program with Chi-square t-Test Goodness of Fit and Mc Nemar test. The results shows that, well-fed (last meal 7 days before testing) and starved (last meal 14 days before testing) test spiders of each species took Ae. albopictus mosquito more often than other insects in both alternate-day and simultaneous- presentation tests using living prey (P<0.05). It was also revealed that the preference of P. petersi for Ae. Albopictus mosquito over other insects offered is weaker than that of E. flavocincta. Larger salticids showed quick response; while attack was quite delayed by the smaller ones and with some difficulties. There was similar preference by both test spiders when well-fed and starved.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0975-5845},
	author = {Maimusa, A. H. and Rabiu, S. and Inusa, M. N. and Grandawa, M. M.}
}
@article {14977,
	title = {New Curculionidae, with notes on synonymy},
	journal = {Annals and Magazine of Natural History},
	volume = {(10) 6},
	year = {1930},
	pages = {551-577},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {Baryopadus [Zoology / / distinct gen. p. 558]. Cratopechus arundinarum [Zoology / / ] [ / / ]. Cryptorrhynchus [Zoology / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ]. Insecta [Migration / / Insalar (including New Zealand) Marquesas Is. Rhyncogonus navicularis sp. n. (Cure.)]. Listroderes [Zoology / / Schh. (=Hyperoides  Mshl) p. 574]. Lixus bidentatus [Zoology / / Klb. (=Lixus roccattii Camerano) p. 574].Lyparopais [Zoology / / in subfam. Tanyrhinchinae p. 559].Nemestra [Zoology / / placed in subfam. Tanyr-rhynehinae p. 559].Oreoscotus [Zoology / / in Anthonominae p. 574].Platypterocis [Zoology / / in Otiorrhynchinae p. 573].Polydius [Zoology / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ] [ / / ].Rhyncogonus navicularis [Migration / / ].SolenorrhinusStramia [Zoology / / restored to Tanyrrhynchinae p. 559].Strongylorrhinus clarki [Zoology / / Aru Is Australia And Tasmania sp. n. (Curc.)].Xestorrhinus [Zoology / / [Xenorrhinus in error]Xestorrhinus costatus sp. n Uganda p. 556 fig].Insecta.Apion arabicum (Apionidae).Apion ceylonicum - Gerst. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion cingalense - Wlk. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion shinghalense - Wagn. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion singhalensis - Hllr. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion standfussi - Wagn. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Apion stigma (Apionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sudan p. 562, Apionzizyphi, Mshl., (=, Apion standfussi, Wagn., ), Apion arabicum, new toSudan p. 563, Apion ceylonicum, Gerst., (=, Apion cingalense, Wlk.,Apion singhalensis, Hllr., Apion shinghalense, Wagn., ) p. 575].Apion zizyphi - Mshl. (Apionidae): [Systematics].Echinapoderus horridus - Boh. (Attelabidae): [Systematics].Echinapoderus kilimanus - Aur. (Attelabidae): [Systematics, distinctfrom, Echinapoderus horridus, Boh., (=, Echinapoderus schroderi, Voss,) p. 575].Echinapoderus schroderi - Voss (Attelabidae): [Systematics].Acatus (Curculionidae): [Gen nov, gen. n., (Menemaehinae) p. 567,Acatus rhombicus, (with, subsp. n., Acatus natalensis, Natal p. 570),sp. n., Zimbabwe, Portu-guese E. Africa p. 568 fig., [Subsp nov, Spnov]].Acatus natalensis (Curculionidae).Acatus rhombicus (Curculionidae).Acicnemis (Camptorrhinus) reversus - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics, (=, Acicnemis arcuferus, Chev., ), Acicnemis frenata,Pasc., (=, Acicnemis dohrni, Huben., ), Acicnemis stilata, n. n., for,Acicnemis frenata, Hub., nec Pasc., Acicnemis triangulum, Huben., necPasc. distinct from, Semelima triangulum, Pasc., p. 575, Acicnemisfalsa, n. n., for, Acicnemis peduncularis, Huben., nec Pasc. p. 576].Acicnemis arcuferus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis dohrni - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis falsa (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Acicnemis frenata - Hub. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis frenata - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis peduncularis - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Acicnemis stilata (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Acicnemis triangulum - Huben. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Aedophronus - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Mimaulodes,Mshl., ), Aedophronus pretoriensis, sp. n., S. Africa p. 551].Aedophronus pretoriensis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].Alcides saundersi - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Alcidescarbonarius, Pasc, ), Alcides australis, Boisd., (=, Alcidesprofiuens, Pasc, ), Alcides latefasciatus, Chev., [female] (=, Alcidessimus, Chev., ), Alcides lixiformis, Mshl., (=, Alcides maynei, Hust.,) p. 575].Amphialus com-municans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Amphialus discriminans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Amphialuscom-municans, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Aporimus (Curculionidae): [Gen nov, gen. n., for, Cneorrhinusviridanus, Boh., (type), Cneorrhinus languidus, Boh., Cneorrhinusoblongus, Boh., p. 558].Apotomorrhinus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Eodinus,Fst., ), Apotomorrhinus cribratus, Boh., (=, Apotomorrhinus fuscus,Fst., ) p. 576].Apotomorrhinus alboater - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Apotomorrhinus cribratus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Apotomorrhinus fuscus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Balaninus calbum - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Apotomorrhinus alboater, Wlk., ) p. 576].Baris signatus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Mecinusrelictus, Wlk., ) from, Apotomorrhinus, p. 576].Baryopadus (Curculionidae).Brachyceropsis - Auriv. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Xenostes,Simps., ), Brachyceropsis verrucosa, F., (=, Brachyceropsis jamesoni,Simps., ) p. 574].Brachyceropsis jamesoni - Simps. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachyceropsis verrucosa - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus acerbus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus annulatus - Gerst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus atrox - Gerst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus capito - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus crispatirostris - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus cristatus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus detritus - Thunb. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus dorsomaculatus - Qued. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus ebullinus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus erinaceus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus fascicularis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus fasciculosus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gemmatus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gemmifer - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus gryphus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus honorabilis - Brancsik (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus inaequalis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus inaequalis - Thunb. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus indutus - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus intutus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Brachycerus acerbus, Gyll., ), Brachycerus scutirostris, Gyll., (=,Brachycerus crispatirostris, Gyll., ), Brachycerus fascicularis, Ol.,(=, Brachycerus cristatus, Per., ), Brachycerus capito, Pasc.,distinct from, Brachycerus stellaris, Ol., Brachycerus inaequalis,Ol., (=, Brachycerus dorsomaculatus, Qued., ) distinct from,Brachycerus tauriculus, Sparrm., Brachycerus thunbergi, Gyll., (=,Brachycerus inaequalis, Thunb., nec Ol.), Brachycerus zeyheri, Gyll.,(=, Brachycerus ebullinus, Per., ), Brachycerus atrox, Gerst., (=,Brachycerus gryphus, Pasc., ), Brachycerus annulatus, Gerst., (=,Brachycerus honorabilis, Brancsik, ), Brachycerus indutus, Per., (=,Brachycerus loquax, Hartm., ), Brachycerus margaritaceus, Germ.,distinct from, Brachycerus tuberosus, Wied., Brachycerus strumosus,Pasc., (=, Brachycerus mamillatus, Aur., ), Brachycerus vestitus,Gyll., (=, Brachycerus piger, Gyll., ), Brachycerus detritus, Thunb.,(=, Brachycerus pustulosus, Gyll., ), Brachycerus tauriculus, Sparrm.,(=, Brachycerus reflezus, Gyll., Brachycerus nebulosus, Ol., ) p. 573,Brachycerus variolosus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus rugipes, Gyll., ),Brachycerus fasciculosus, Germ., (=, Brachycerus setiger, Gyll., ),Brachycerus gemmatus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus tuberosus, Wied., ),Brachycerus gemmifer, Germ., (=, Brachycerus ulcerosus, Gyll., ),Brachycerus erinaceus, Ol., (=, Brachycerus varius, Per., ) p. 574].Brachycerus loquax - Hartm. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus mamillatus - Aur. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus margaritaceus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus nebulosus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus piger - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus pustulosus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus reflezus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus rugipes - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus scutirostris - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus setiger - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus stellaris - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus strumosus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus tauriculus - Sparrm. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus thunbergi - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus tuberosus - Wied. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus ulcerosus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus variolosus - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus varius - Per. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus vestitus - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Brachycerus zeyheri - Gyll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Calandra oryzae - L. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Cossonusquadnmacula, Wlk., ) p. 577].Calandra porcata (Curculionidae).Camptorrhmus notabilis - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Cholus (Curculio) spinipes - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cholus wattsi, Mshl., ) p. 574].Cholus wattsi - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus languidus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus oblongus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cneorrhinus viridanus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes - Schonh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Aryplaeus,Pasc., type, Colobodes suturalis, Pasc., ), Colobodes bilbergi, Boh.,(=, Colobodes pustulosus, Pasc., ) p. 566].Colobodes bilbergi - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes pustulosus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Colobodes suturalis - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Coptorhamphus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cosmopolites sordidus - Germ. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus cribricollis, Wlk., ) p. 576].Cossonus quadnmacula - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cratopechus arundinarum (Curculionidae).Cratopechus gedyei (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Kenya p. 563,Cratopechus arundinarum, amended measurements p. 565 fig.].Cryptorrhyachus mangiferae - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cryptorrhyachus ineffectus, Wlk., ), Cryptorrhyachusfasciculaticollis, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Cryptorrhynchus (Curculionidae).Cryptorrhynchus fasciculaticollis - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics].Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Cryptorrhynchus mangiferae - F. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus, Wlk., ), Cryptorrhynchusfasciculaticollis, Wlk., from, Desmidophorus, p. 576].Cydianerus (Curculionidae).Cydianerus alrox (Curculionidae).Cydianerus argenteus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics,Systematics, (=, Polydius donceli, Bovie, ), Cydianerus pascoei,Bovie, from, Polydius, p. 572, Cydianerus alrox, see, Polydius, (=,Polydius donceli, Bovie, ), Cydianerus pascoei, Bovie, from, Polydius,p. 572, Cydianerus atrox, see, Polydius].Cydianerus atrox (Curculionidae).Cydianerus pascoei - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus callosus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus ciliatus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus congoanus - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus k. - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus kamerunicus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus maynei - Hust. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Derelomus plagiatus - Fhs. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Derelomus ciliatus, Hust., ), Derelomus subvittatus, Fst., [male] (=,Derelomus maynei, Hust., ), Derelomus kamerunicus, Fst., [male] (=,Derelomus callosus, Hust., ), Derelomus k., Fst., [female] (=,Derelomus congoanus, Hust., ) p. 575].Derelomus subvittatus - Fst. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus - Lac. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Marmarochelus,Desbr., ), Ectatorrhinus porosus, Wlk., (=, Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni,Desbr., ), Ectatorrhinus trinarius, Pasc., (=, Ectatorrhinus nanus,Hllr., ), Ectatorrhinus galeotes, Pasc., (=, Ectatorrhinus conifer,Hllr., ) from, Aryptaeus, p. 566].Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni - Desbr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus conifer - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus galeotes - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus nanus - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus porosus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Ectatorrhinus trinarius - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Elytrurus subvittatus - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Elytrurus horizontalis, Fairm., ) p. 573].Embrithes cirricollis - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Embrithesmulticarinatus, Boh., from, Siteutes, p. 573].Embrithes multicarinatus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus arrogans - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, Systematics,(=, Entimus phbeius, Roel., ), Entimus granulatus, L., (=, Entimusspeciosus, Er., ) p. 572, (=, Entimus plebeius, Roel., ), Entimusgranulatus, L., (=, Entimus speciosus, Er., ) p. 572].Entimus granulatus - L. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus phbeius - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus plebeius - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Entimus speciosus - Er. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Hyperoides - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Listroderes (Curculionidae).Lixus bidentatus (Curculionidae).Lixus roccattii - Camerano (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Lobotrachelus coffeae (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sudan p. 566].Lophobaris piperis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Sumatra p. 370].Lyparopais (Curculionidae).Mecinus relictus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecistocerus assimilans - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics,Mecistocerus declaratus, Wlk., from, Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Mecistocerus declaratus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus helleri (Curculionidae): [Nom nov].Mecopus ludovid - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus serrirostris - Hllr. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Mecopus serrirostris - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Mecopus ludovid, Hllr., ), Mecopus helleri, n. n., for, Mecopusserrirostris, Hllr., nec Pasc. p. 576].Myocalandra exarata - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus exquisitus, Wlk., Calandra porcata, Pasc.) p. 577].Nemestra (Curculionidae).Niphades vexalus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Cryptorrhynchus, p. 576].Odoiporus longicollis - Ol. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Sphenophorus glabridiscus, Wlk., ) p. 576].Omotemnus (Rhynchophorus) introducens - Wlk. (Curculionidae):[Systematics, (=, Omotemnus ceylanensis, Roel., ) p. 577].Omotemnus ceylanensis - Roel. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Oreoscotus (Curculionidae).Parasystates hancocki (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].Parasystates subconvexus - Aur. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, type ofgen. p. 556, Parasystates hancocki, sp. n., Uganda p. 555].Phloeophagus marginalia (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Uganda p.571].Phylaitis panops - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, from,Sphenophorus, p. 576].Platypterocis (Curculionidae).Polydius - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Polytelidius,Bovie, Polydius coelestinus, Perty, (=, Polydius orbigynyi, Chev., ),Polydius atrox, Germ. from, Cydianerus, p. 572].Polydius atrox (Curculionidae).Polydius coelestinus - Perty (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polydius donceli - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polydius orbigynyi - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Polytelidius - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Psilosomus (Cossonus) hebes - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=,Psilosomus opacus, Woll., ) p. 577].Psilosomus opacus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus brunneus - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus tribuloides - Bovie (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhigus tribuloides - Pall. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Rhigusbrunneus, Bovie, ), Rhigus vespertilio, Pasc., [male] (=, Rhigustribuloides, Bovie, nec Pall.) p. 572].Rhigus vespertilio - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Rhyncogonus navicularis (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., MarquesasIs. p. 553].Saphorrhynchus - Sharp (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Heteraomus,Broun, ), Saphorrhynchus longicornis, Sharp, (=, Saphorrhynchusargenlatus, Broun, ) p. 574].Saphorrhynchus argenlatus - Broun (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Saphorrhynchus longicornis - Sharp (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Sciobius - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Siteutes, Schh.,type, Sciobius albicinctus, Boh., ) p. 572].Sciobius albicinctus - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Seleuca - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Coptorhamphus,Woll., Hylobiinae), Seleuca strangulatus, Woll., (=, Seleuca linearis,Mshl., ) p. 574].Seleuca linearis - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Seleuca strangulatus - Woll. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Sipalus hypocrita - Boh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Sipalustinctus, Wlk., ) p. 577].Sipalus tinctus - Wlk. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Solenorrhinus (Curculionidae).Spermologus - Schh. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Tiphaura,Pasc., ) p. 574, Spermologus funesta, Pasc., (=, Spermologusbreviscapus, Mshl., ) p. 575].Spermologus breviscapus - Mshl. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Spermologus funesta - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Stramia (Curculionidae).Strongylorrhinus clarki (Curculionidae): [Sp nov, sp. n., Australia p.559, Strongylorrhinus ochraceus, further description p. 560].Strongylorrhinus ochraceus (Curculionidae).Tetracyphus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics, (=, Neiphagus,Pasc., ), Tetracyphus odontomus, Chev., (=, Tetracyphus fascicularis,Pasc., ) p. 576].Tetracyphus fascicularis - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Tetracyphus odontomus - Chev. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Tiphaura - Pasc. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Xenorrhinus (Curculionidae).Xenostes - Simps. (Curculionidae): [Systematics].Xestorrhinus (Curculionidae).Xestorrhinus costatus (Curculionidae): [Sp nov].},
	keywords = {Acatus, Acatus natalensis, Acatus rhombicus, Acicnemis (Camptorrhinus) reversus, Acicnemis arcuferus, Acicnemis dohrni, Acicnemis falsa, Acicnemis frenata, Acicnemis peduncularis, Acicnemis stilata, Acicnemis triangulum, Aedophronus, Aedophronus pretoriensis,, Alcides, Alcides australis, Alcides carbonarius, Alcides latefasciatus, Alcides lixiformis, Alcides maynei, Alcides saundersi, Alcides simus, Amphialus communicans, Amphialus discriminans, Apion arabicum, Apion ceylonicum, Apion cingalense, Apion shinghalense, Apion standfussi, Apion stigma, Apion zizyphi, Aporimus, Apotomorrhinus, Apotomorrhinus alboater, Apotomorrhinus cribratus, Apotomorrhinus fuscus, Aryplaeus, Aryptaeus, Balaninus calbum, Baris signatus, Baryopadus, Brachyceropsis, Brachyceropsis jamesoni, Brachyceropsis verrucosa, Brachycerus acerbus, Brachycerus annulatus, Brachycerus atrox, Brachycerus capito, Brachycerus crispatirostris, Brachycerus cristatus, Brachycerus detritus, Brachycerus dorsomaculatus, Brachycerus ebullinus, Brachycerus erinaceus, Brachycerus fascicularis, Brachycerus fasciculosus, Brachycerus gemmatus, Brachycerus gemmifer, Brachycerus gryphus, Brachycerus honorabilis, Brachycerus inaequalis, Brachycerus indutus, Brachycerus intutus, Brachycerus loquax, Brachycerus mamillatus, Brachycerus margaritaceus, Brachycerus nebulosus, Brachycerus piger, Brachycerus pustulosus, Brachycerus reflezus, Brachycerus rugipes, Brachycerus scutirostris, Brachycerus setiger, Brachycerus stellaris, Brachycerus strumosus, Brachycerus tauriculus, Brachycerus thunbergi, Brachycerus tuberosus, Brachycerus ulcerosus, Brachycerus variolosus, Brachycerus varius, Brachycerus vestitus, Brachycerus zeyheri, Calandra porcata, Camptorrhmus notabilis, Cholus spinipes, Cholus wattsi, Cneorrhinus languidus, Cneorrhinus oblongus, Cneorrhinus viridanus, Colobodes, Colobodes bilbergi, Colobodes pustulosus, Colobodes suturalis, Coptorhamphus, Cosmopolites sordidus, Cossonus quadnmacula, Cratopechus arundinarum, Cratopechus gedyei, Cryptorhynchus, Cryptorrhyachus fasciculaticollis, Cryptorrhyachus ineffectus, Cryptorrhynchus fasciculaticollis, Cryptorrhynchus ineffectus, Cydianerus, Cydianerus alrox, Cydianerus argenteus, Cydianerus atrox, Cydianerus pascoei, Derelomus, Derelomus callosus, Derelomus ciliatus, Derelomus congoanus, Derelomus kamerunicus, Derelomus maynei, Derelomus plagiatus, Derelomus subvittatus, Desmidophorus, Echinapoderus horridus, Echinapoderus kilimanus, Echinapoderus schroderi, Ectatorrhinus, Ectatorrhinus atkinsoni, Ectatorrhinus conifer, Ectatorrhinus galeotes, Ectatorrhinus nanus, Ectatorrhinus porosus, Ectatorrhinus trinarius, Elytrurus horizontalis, Elytrurus subvittatus, Embrithes cirricollis, Embrithes multicarinatus, Entimus arrogans, Entimus granulatus, Entimus plebeius, Entimus speciosus, Eodinus,, Heteraomus, Hyperoides, Listroderes, Lixus bidentatus, Lixus roccattii, Lobotrachelus coffeae, Lophobaris piperis, Lyparopais, Marmarochelus,, Mecinus relictus, Mecistocerus assimilans, Mecistocerus declaratus, Mecopus helleri, Mecopus ludovid, Mecopus serrirostris, Mimaulodes, Myocalandra exarata, Neiphagus,, Nemestra, Niphades vexalus, Odoiporus longicollis, Omotemnus ceylanensis, Omotemnus introducens, Oreoscotus, Parasystates hancocki, Parasystates subconvexus, Phloeophagus marginalia, Phylaitis panops, Platypterocis, Polydius, Polydius atrox, Polydius coelestinus, Polydius donceli, Polydius orbigynyi, Polydius,, Polytelidius, Psilosomus hebes, Psilosomus opacus, Rhigus brunneus, Rhigus tribuloides, Rhigus vespertilio, Rhyncogonus navicularis, Saphorrhynchus, Saphorrhynchus argenlatus, Saphorrhynchus longicornis, Sciobius, Sciobius albicinctus, Seleuca, Seleuca linearis, Seleuca strangulatus, Semelima triangulum, Sipalus hypocrita, Sipalus tinctus, Siteutes, Sitophilus oryzae, Solenorrhinus, Spermologus, Spermologus breviscapus, Spermologus funesta, Sphenophorus, Sphenophorus cribricollis, Sphenophorus exquisitus, Sphenophorus glabridiscus, Sternochetus mangiferae, Stramia, Strongylorrhinus clarki, Strongylorrhinus ochraceus, Tetracyphus, Tetracyphus fascicularis, Tetracyphus odontomus, Tiphaura, Xenorrhinus, Xenostes, Xestorrhinus, Xestorrhinus costatus},
	author = {Marshall, Sir G.}
}
@article {14488,
	title = {Effect of allylisothiocyanate on Sitophilus oryzae, Tribolium confusum and Plodia interpunctella: Toxicity and effect on insect mitochondria},
	journal = {Crop Protection},
	volume = {33},
	year = {2012},
	month = {Mar},
	pages = {40-51},
	abstract = {Allylisothiocyanate is a volatile chemical used for insect fumigation. Because its mode of action is not fully understood, the insecticidal efficacy of AITC was investigated using dry and wet-table applications on the major stored-product insects Sitophilus oryzae (L), Plodia interpunctella (Hubner), and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin Du Val. The LC50 values 72 h after fumigation with AITC against S. oryzae adults, P. interpunctella larvae, T. confusum adults and T. confusum larvae were 2.0, 2.2, 3.7, and 4.7[mu]l L-1 air, respectively. The complete mortality (100\%) of all four insect pests was recorded after a 72-h exposure to AITC fumes at an atmospheric concentration of 11.5 [mu]l L-1 air, with results similar to those found with insects exposed to a recommended 5 mg L-1 dose of phosphine. No differences were detected between the effects of AITC and PH3 on the morphology of mitochondria taken from the midgut and integument epithelial cells of treated T confusum 3rd instar larvae. Rarefaction and vacuolization of the mitochondrial matrix were evident. The quantity of cristae and density of the electron matrix were also reduced. AITC has potential as a biodegradable and safe insect fumigant. The mitochondria alteration confirms the insecticidal effect of AITC, which may act on the respiratory system. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0261-2194},
	author = {Mansour, Eltayeb E. and Mi, Fengyu and Zhang, Guoan and Xie, Jiugao and Wang, Yongmo and Kargbo, Abu}
}
@article {14481,
	title = {Acoustic Indicators for Targeted Detection of Stored Product and Urban Insect Pests by Inexpensive Infrared, Acoustic, and Vibrational Detection of Movement},
	journal = {Journal of Economic Entomology},
	volume = {103},
	number = {5},
	year = {2010},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {1636-1646},
	abstract = {Crawling and scraping activity of three stored-product pests, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), and Stegobium paniceum (L.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae), and two urban pests. Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae) and Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), were monitored individually by infrared sensors, microphones, and a piezoelectric sensor in a small arena to evaluate effects of insect locomotory behavior and size on the ability of an inexpensively constructed instrument to detect insects and distinguish among different species. Adults of all species could be detected when crawling or scraping. The smallest insects in the study, first-fourth-instar C. lectularius nymphs, could not be detected easily when crawling, but could be detected when scraping. Sound and vibration sensors detected brief, 3-10-ms impulses from all tested species, often grouped in distinctive trains (bursts), typical of impulses in previous acoustic detection experiments. To consider the potential for targeting or focusing detection on particular species of interest, indicators were developed to assess the likelihood of detection of C. lectularius. Statistically significant differences were found between C. lectularius and other species in distributions of three measured variables: infrared signal durations, sound impulse-burst durations, and sound pressure levels (energy) of impulses that best matched an averaged spectrum (profile) of scraping behavior. Thus, there is potential that signals collected by an inexpensive, polymodal-sensor instrument could be used in automated trapping systems to detect a targeted species, 0.1 mg or larger, in environments where servicing of traps is difficult or when timeliness of trapping information is important.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0022-0493},
	author = {Mankin, R. W. and Hodges, R. D. and Nagle, H. T. and Schal, C. and Pereira, R. M. and Koehler, P. G.}
}
@article {14401,
	title = {Prey Preferences of Evarcha flavocincta and Plexippus petersi (Araneae: Salticidae) from Malaysia},
	journal = {Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences},
	volume = {3},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {January},
	pages = {105-109},
	abstract = {Two jumping spiders, Plexippus petersi and Evarcha flavocincta (Araneae: Salticidae) were chosen for a test of prey preference from several species of spiders commonly found in University Putra Malaysia (UPM) Serdang, Malaysia campus. Test spiders were maintained in captivity on diet of early stage larvae of Tenebrio molitor (mealworm beetle) and midges, Chironomus sp. For testing, adult mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse), fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) and rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) were used. Two types of tests using living prey were employed, i.e. simultaneous-presentation tests (two types of prey provided at the same time) and alternate-day tests (different types of prey provided on successive days). All level of significance was determined at = 0.05 using a statistical program with Chi-square t-Test Goodness of Fit and Mc Nemar test. The results shows that, well-fed (last meal 7 days before testing) and starved (last meal 14 days before testing) test spiders of each species took Ae. albopictus mosquito more often than other insects in both alternate-day and simultaneous- presentation tests using living prey (P<0.05). It was also revealed that the preference of P. petersi for Ae. Albopictus mosquito over other insects offered is weaker than that of E. flavocincta. Larger salticids showed quick response; while attack was quite delayed by the smaller ones and with some difficulties. There was similar preference by both test spiders when well-fed and starved.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0975-5845},
	author = {Maimusa, A. H. and Rabiu, S. and Inusa, M. N. and Grandawa, M. M.}
}
@article {13487,
	title = {The Influence of Herb Species on Population Processes of Sitophilus oryzae L (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)},
	journal = {Entomologia Generalis},
	volume = {33},
	number = {4},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011},
	pages = {273-280},
	abstract = {The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of powdered herbs: sage Salvia officinalis L, wormwood Artemisia absinthium L. lavender Lavandula officinalis L, and peppermint Mentha piperita L on the population of the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus 1763). The population number, mortality and the sex structure of rice weevil populations were studied. The powdered herb preparations were applied at two concentrations: 1.2\% and 0.5\%. The experiments were conducted in the laboratory at 28 [degree]C and 60 [plus or minus] 5\% RH. The effect of the plant preparations depended on their concentrations. The complete inhibition of the development of S oryzae occurred at the concentration of 1.2\% of the powdered material. An inhibition effect on the rice weevil populations was also demonstrated for wormwood, sage, and the lavender at a 0.5\% concentration. The chemical compounds contained in these herbs result in a higher mortality among females. The wormwood, sage, and the lavender may possibly be applied to protect stored products against infestation by S oryzae.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0171-8177},
	author = {Klys, Malgorzata}
}
@article {13341,
	title = {SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SIX VARIETIES OF RICE TO THE INFESTATION OF RICE WEEVIL, SITOPHILUS ORYZAE (L.) (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)},
	journal = {Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences},
	volume = {21},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {163-168},
	abstract = {The susceptibility of six varieties of rice, Oryza sativa, viz. Lata, Minicate, Nazersail, Parija, Kalijira and Kataribhog, to the infestation of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), was studied on the basis of population build up under an ambient condition (28 [plus or minus] 4[degree]C and 70 [plus or minus] 4 \% RH) of the laboratory. The mean weights of each grain of the above six rice varieties were 16.9, 16.1, 11.43, 13.87, 6.23 and 9.77 mg, respectively; mean lengths were 6.47, 6.56, 5.37, 5.38, 4.22 and 4.92 mm, respectively; mean widths were 2.45, 2.03, 2.05, 2.17, 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively; and moisture contents were 11.55, 10.75, 11.6, 12.71, 11.85, and 12.1 per cents, respectively. As far as the number of emerging adults is concerned, the weevil showed the highest number (695) in Nazersail on the 16th week, Lata (755) on the 18th week, Minicate (654) on the 16th week, Parija (482) on the 20th week, Kalijira (402) on the 20th week, and Kataribhog (456) on the 20th week. The mean numbers of the adult weevils in the above six varieties after 22 weeks of rearing were 425, 410, 351, 387, 357 and 400, respectively and was statistically significant at 5\% level. The degree of susceptibility of the rice varieties to the rice weevils from the highest to lowest susceptibility was - Lata > Nazersail > Minicate > Pariza > Kataribhog > Kalijira.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1021-2787},
	author = {Khan, Humayun Reza and Halder, Polash Kanti}
}
@article {12549,
	title = {Evaluation of quality protein maize genotypes for resistance to stored grain weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)},
	journal = {International Journal of Tropical Insect Science},
	volume = {27},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	month = {June},
	pages = {114-121},
	abstract = {The stored grain weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus), causes significant losses to maize grains in tropical countries. Despite the nutritional superiority of the quality protein maize (QPM), an important concern is the possible vulnerability of QPM genotypes to stored grain weevil infestation. In the present study, the responses of 24 QPM inbred lines, along with several non-QPM inbred lines and hybrids, were evaluated against S. oryzae under laboratory conditions. Two attributes, namely (i) \% weight loss in the grains after a fixed period of incubation with the insect and (ii) the number of progeny insects (insect multiplication) generated from six pairs of adult insects, were considered. A cumulative resistance index was computed for each genotype giving equal weight to both attributes. The study revealed DMRQPM-60 and CML167 as the most resistant entries. Shaktiman-1, the released QPM hybrid in India, showed moderate resistance against the grain weevil. However, most of the elite QPM inbred lines as well as some non-QPM inbred lines and hybrids were found to be highly susceptible to the weevil infestation. To explore the possible relationship between enhanced protein quality and varying degree of kernel vitreousness and vulnerability to the grain weevil infestation, both the QPM and the non-QPM genotypes were analysed. The correlations between kernel quality traits and kernel texture with \% kernel weight loss due to weevil infestation and insect multiplication were found to be non-significant, indicating possible influence of other factors, including pericarp thickness and endosperm composition, in determining the susceptibility of the QPM genotypes to S. oryzae. The study indicates that QPM genotypes are not necessarily susceptible to the stored grain weevil and identifies promising QPM genotypes with resistance to S. oryzae.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1742-7584},
	author = {Hossain, Firoz and Boddupalli, Prasanna M. and Sharma, Rakesh K. and Kumar, Pradyumn and Singh, Bir Bahadur}
}
@article {11917,
	title = {CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS AND TOXICITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS OF ORIENTAL ARBORVITAE, PLATYCLADUS ORIENTALIS (L.) FRANCO, AGAINST THREE STORED-PRODUCT BEETLES},
	journal = {Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research},
	volume = {72},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {Apr},
	pages = {188-194},
	abstract = {Plant secondary metabolites play an important role in plant-insect interactions and therefore such compounds may have insecticidal or biological activity against insects. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils of leaves and fruits from oriental arborvitae (Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco) (Cupressaceae) was investigated against adults of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.), rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.), and red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum Herbst). Fresh leaves and fruits were subjected to hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus and the chemical composition of the volatile oils was studied by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Twenty-six compounds (92.9\%) and 23 constituents (97.8\%) were identified in the leaf and the fruit oils, respectively. The major components of both leaves and fruits oils were [alpha]-pinene (35.2\%, 50.7\%), [alpha]-cedrol (14.6\%, 6.9\%) and [DELTA]-3-carene (6.3\%, 13.8\%), respectively. Both oils in the same concentration were tested for their fumigant toxicity on each species. Results showed that leaf oils were more toxic than fruit oils against three species of insects. Callosobruchus maculatus was more susceptible than S. oryzae and T. castaneum. LC50 values of the leaf and the fruit oils at 24 h were estimated 6.06 and 9.24 [mu]L L-1 air for C. maculatus, 18.22 and 21.56 [mu]L L-1 air for S. oryzae, and 32.07 and 36.58 [mu]L L-1 air for T. castaneum, respectively. These results suggested that P. orientalis oils may have potential as a control agent against C. maculatus, S. oryzae, and T. castaneum.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	author = {Hashemi, Seyed Mehdi and Safavi, Seyed Ali}
}
@article {11421,
	title = {Effect of light on activity patterns of some night flying adult insects},
	journal = {Journal of Ecobiology},
	volume = {23},
	number = {1},
	year = {2008},
	month = {August},
	pages = {37-42},
	type = {Article},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0970-9037},
	author = {Govindarajan, D.}
}
@article {11270,
	title = {Effects of prior experience on host selection and host utilization by two populations of Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)},
	journal = {Environmental Entomology},
	volume = {37},
	number = {5},
	year = {2008},
	month = {October},
	pages = {1300-1306},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {The effect of adult learning through an oviposition and host feeding experience was studied in two populations of Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), in choice and no-choice experiments in the laboratory using last instars of rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L., and lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), as hosts. In choice experiments, 20 wheat kernels infested by rice weevil and 20 by lesser grain borer were placed randomly in petri dish (15 by 100 mm) arenas. In no-choice experiments, 10 host-infested wheat kernels, either with rice weevils or with lesser grain borers, were mixed thoroughly in 500 g of uninfested wheat placed in a 0.945-liter glass jar (75 by 170 mm) arenas. A. calandrae females from a laboratory and field populations that were experienced with host larvae or naive were introduced singly into each experimental arena and allowed to sting and oviposit for 24 h. An oviposition experience with rice weevil or lesser grain borer had a stronger effect on host preference in choice experiments compared with experiments with naive wasps. Host-finding and parasitism rates were increased by prior experience with rice weevils in no-choice experiments. A. calandrae females clearly preferred rice weevil larvae for parasitization over larvae of lesser grain borer regardless of parasitoid population or prior experience. Also, A. calandrae females chose rice weevil larvae for producing female progeny and lesser grain borer for male progeny in choice experiments. The implications of the results of this study are discussed in relation to host preference and the selection of parasitoid populations for biological control programs in stored grains.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0046-225X},
	author = {Ghimire, Mukti N. and Phillips, Thomas W.}
}
@article {11269,
	title = {Suitability of five species of stored-product insects as hosts for development and reproduction of the parasitoid Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)},
	journal = {Journal of Economic Entomology},
	volume = {100},
	number = {5},
	year = {2007},
	month = {October},
	pages = {1732-1739},
	abstract = {We investigated the ability of two populations of Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), to parasitize and develop on late instars of five different stored-product insects that typically complete their development inside seeds of grain or legume species or other dry commodity. The host species were the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.); cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.); rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.); lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.); and Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier). Experiments were conducted in the laboratory in a no-choice design by using petri dishes (15 by 100 mm) as experimental arenas with 20 host larvae. A. calandrae females from populations originating in Georgia (GA) and Oklahoma (OK) were introduced singly into experimental arenas and allowed to sting and oviposit for 24 h. Parasitism by the OK population was greater than that for the GA population across all hosts. However, no or very low parasitism was found on Angoumois grain moth for either population in this experiment. The highest number of parasitoid progeny was recorded on cowpea weevil (15.9) followed by rice weevil (11.5) and cigarette beetle (10.8) for the OK population. A similar trend was observed in the GA population. The highest proportion of female progeny was produced on cowpea weevil (73.0\%) by the OK population. Conversely, a higher proportion of female progeny was produced on rice weevil (64.6\%) by the GA population than produced by the OK population. Parasitoid adults were significantly larger and heavier when they developed on cowpea weevil irrespective of parasitoid population. The possible application of these results for biological control of stored-product insects is discussed.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0022-0493},
	author = {Ghimire, Mukti N. and Phillips, Thomas W.}
}
@article {11004,
	title = {Insect pests dissemination by extruded starch packages},
	journal = {Neotropical Entomology},
	volume = {38},
	number = {4},
	year = {2009},
	month = {July-August},
	pages = {548-549},
	abstract = {We observed the viability of extruded starch products used as impact protector for fragile packing as a food source of the following stored grains pests: Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens), Lasioderma serricorne (Fabr.), Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.), Sitophilus oryzae (L.), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera) and Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera). Cryptolestes ferrugineus, L. serricorne and T. castaneum were found in these products, which are used by them as shelter and food. Under experimentation, we observed the development of O. surinamensis, S. oryzae and P. interpunctella feeding on this food source. Thus, it is recorded the viability of such material to be a potential dispersal vehicle to spread insect pests.},
	keywords = {Oryzaephilus surinamensis, Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1519-566X},
	author = {Fraga, Felipe B. and Alencar, Isabel D. C. C. and Tavares, Marcelo T.}
}
@article {10987,
	title = {Influence of male density on the courtship and mating duration of male rice weevils, Sitophilus oryzae},
	journal = {New Zealand Plant Protection},
	volume = {62},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	pages = {76-79},
	abstract = {The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a major pest of stored grains throughout the world. This experiment examined the capacity of male S. oryzae to adjust their mating behaviour in response to male density (i.e. 1, 5 and 10 males) maintained with a single female. Results show that males spent less time in courting females with antennal contact at density 1 when compared to densities 5 and 10. Copulation duration increased in response to the increase in rival densities. The mechanism behind this phenomenon may be (1) a mate guarding strategy to enhance reproductive success by reducing the chance of sperm displacement by competitors and (2) a strategy to avoid damage to the reproductive organs of their mates by multiple mating.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1175-9003},
	author = {Flay, C. D. and He, X. Z. and Wang, Q.}
}
@article {10988,
	title = {Influence of multiple mating on female reproductive fitness in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae},
	journal = {New Zealand Plant Protection},
	volume = {63},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010},
	pages = {201-207},
	abstract = {The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important pest of stored grains throughout the world. This paper examined how multiple mating affected female reproductive fitness in the laboratory. Over 60 days, females that permanently paired with males, mated twice with different males or four times with the same males did not suffer from significant decline of offspring survival, while females mated once, twice with the same males and four times with different males had significant declines. It is suggested that mating once or twice with the same males is not enough for females to maximise their reproductive fitness. The significant decline of offspring survival in females that mated with four different males may be caused by reproductive organ damage or other factors that reduce their fertility due to excessive polyandry.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1175-9003},
	author = {Flay, C. D. and He, X. Z. and Wang, Q.}
}
@article {10767,
	title = {Calorimetric evaluation of responses of Sitophilus oryzae and Tribolium confusum to elevated temperatures and controlled atmospheres},
	journal = {Journal of Stored Products Research},
	volume = {44},
	number = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {295-303},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {Metabolic heat rates, determined by microcalorimetry, were used to measure the effect of controlled atmospheres (CAs) and elevated temperatures on the stored-product insects Sitophilus oryzae (rice weevil) and Tribolium confusum (confused flour beetle). Results for larval and adult stages in air, and in a range of low O2 and/or high CO2 CAs, at temperatures from 15 to 45 [degree]C, showed the general effectiveness of such atmospheres in lowering the lethal temperatures relative to those in air. Effects on adult S. oryzae at 25 [degree]C were explored in more detail in experiments using the following conditions: exposure to anoxic CAs for extended times; exposure to hypoxic CAs; and simulated hermetic storage. A simple scanning calorimetric method was developed for determining lethal temperatures and a combined thermo-gravimetric and differential thermal-analysis method Was used to interpret the thermal events, due to loss of water, occurring at and above these temperatures. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0022-474X},
	author = {Downes, C. J. and van Epenhuijsen, C. W. and Lill, R. E. and Downes, J. E. and Carpenter, A. and Brash, D.}
}
@article {10602,
	title = {Rostrum structure and development in the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea: Dryophthoridae)},
	journal = {Arthropod Structure \& Development},
	volume = {40},
	number = {6},
	year = {2011},
	month = {Nov},
	pages = {549-558},
	abstract = {A documentation and review of weevil rostrum growth is made through examination of the developmental life stages in the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus). Histological and morphological examinations are made utilizing light, fluorescent, and electron microscopy. In S. oryzae, rostral tissue begins proliferating in the late 4th instar larva and continues through to the pupal stage, with the majority of rostrum growth taking place in the prepupa. Adult cranial and rostral morphology is also reviewed, focusing on structures that may be pertinent to phylogeny reconstruction. The weevil rostrum is essentially an extension of various head sclerites that are basal to the mouthparts. Therefore, while the mouthparts are fairly similar to other Coleoptera in basic form, the head is markedly different due to its anterior extension. By understanding the more noticeable details of rostrum growth and structure, this study may serve as a foundation for comparative studies of a similar nature and as a basis for beginning research on the genetic nature of rostrum formation and evolution throughout the weevil clade. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {morphology, Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {1467-8039},
	author = {Davis, Steven R.}
}
@article {9948,
	title = {Insecticidal effect of spinosad dust, in combination with diatomaceous earth, against two stored-grain beetle species},
	journal = {Journal of Stored Products Research},
	volume = {44},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {347-353},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {Laboratory bioassays were carried out to determine the efficacy of spinosad applied alone or combined with the diatomaceous earth (DE) SilicoSec against adult rice weevils, Sitophilus oryzae and confused flour beetles, Tribolium confusum. Efficacy was assessed on wheat and maize at three dosages of spinosad dust formulation (corresponding to 0.0625, 0.1875 and 0.625 ppm of active ingredient [AI] for S. oryzae and to 0.1875, 0.625 and 1.25 ppm of AI for T. confusum), alone or combined with SilicoSec at 150 ppm for S. oryzae and 250 ppm for T. confusum. The mortality of S. oryzae exposed for 14 d on wheat treated with spinosad ranged between 83\% and 100\%. Conversely, the mortality of S. oryzae on maize treated with DE or on maize treated with lower doses of spinosad dust did not exceed 19\% and was only 59\% on maize with the highest spinosad dust treatment. Generally, the presence of SilicoSec combined with spinosad did not significantly increase S. oryzae mortality compared with spinosad alone. For T. confusum, mortality on both commodities was lower than for S. oryzae. After 14 d of exposure on wheat, mortality was 14\% at the highest dose of spinosad, but increased to 33\% in the presence of DE. Similar results were also obtained for T. confusum exposed on treated maize, which indicated a joint action between spinosad and DE. In the case of S. oryzae, the inclusion of DE reduced progeny production in comparison with spinosad alone. Progeny production of T. confusum was relatively low in all treatments, compared to progeny production of S. oryzae. The results of the study show the potential of combination treatments of spinosad dust and DE, but efficacy varies with the target insect species and commodity.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0022-474X},
	author = {Chintzoglou, G. and Athanassiou, C. G. and Arthur, F. H.}
}
@article {9942,
	title = {Influence of different diets on Sitophilus granarius (L.) and S. oryzae (L.). I. Oviposition},
	journal = {Entomologica (Bari)},
	volume = {40},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2006-2007(2008)},
	pages = {101-115},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {The oviposition of Sitophilus granarius and S. oryzae was studied, at the same conditions of light, T and RH, on cereal stored grains (wheat, barley, pop-corn and yellow dent corn) and alimentary pasta (pasta containing eggs, maize pasta, brown pasta, two short shape durum wheat pasta and one long shape of the kind "Bigoli{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}). The total number of laid eggs and the fecundity evolution were recorded allowing to establish what sort of cereal grains and pasta is the most open to. S. granarius and S. oryzae attack. For both species wheat, barley and pasta containing eggs were the most preferred for oviposition, while the pasta "Bigoli" was the less. S. oryzae has laid eggs into all the substrates, mainly pasta, more than S. granarius.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus granarius, Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0425-1016},
	author = {Chiesa, Fiorella and Frilli, Franco}
}
@article {9025,
	title = {Molecular identification of Sitophilus spp. (Coleoptera Curculionidae) and detection of immature stages in wheat},
	journal = {Redia},
	volume = {91},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {55-58},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay is proposed to differentiate Sitophilus granarius (L.), S. oryzae (L.), and S. zeamais Motschulsky at different life stages and to detect their hidden infestation in wheat kernels. PCR amplification of genomic DNA using primers designed on the basis of the cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene sequence, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis, Successfully detected the immature stages (egg, larva, pupa) and adult of each species. DNA amplification resulted in a PCR product of 462 bp for S. granarius, whereas S. oryzae and S. zeamais yielded a 311 bp fragment. A sequence comparison between the latter species allowed to identify a mutation that was diagnostic between S. oryzae and S. zeamais through a PCR-RFLP protocol. Digestion of DNA resulted in an uncut fragment (3 11 bp) for S. oryzae, two fragments (174 bp + 137 bp) for S. zeamais and 3 bands (250 bp + 160 bp + 52 bp) for S. granarius. Multiplex PCR reaction enabled to differentiate the three species at all life stages also when simultaneously added to and ground with a 50 g sample of wheat kernels. The reproducibility of the results and high resolution as well as the technical simplicity of the developed molecular method demonstrated its usefulness in the diagnosis of Sitophilus spp. and detection of their hidden infestation in wheat.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus granarius, Sitophilus oryzae, Sitophilus zeamais},
	isbn = {0370-4327},
	author = {Angiolillo, Antonella and Boursier, Luca and Pilla, Fabio and Germinara, Giacinto S. and Rotundo, Giuseppe}
}
@article {8910,
	title = {Suitability of Tamarind and Some Selected Crop Seeds for the Survival and Development of Sitophilus Linearis (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Cucurlionidae)},
	journal = {International Journal of Biology},
	volume = {3},
	number = {3},
	year = {2011},
	month = {July},
	pages = {83-89},
	abstract = {Sitophilus oryzae (L.), Sitophilus zeamais (Mots.) and Sitophilus granarius (L.) are major pests of stored grain, especially on cereals. Sitophilus linearis (Herbst) a congeneric of the afore-listed species was obtained from seeds of a wild plant, Tamarindus indica L. The development of S. linearis on some selected crop seeds as well as tamarind seeds was investigated in the laboratory at 25.3-30.3 [degree]C and 75.0\% [plus or minus] 5.0 RH. One hundred grammes each of heat sterilized maize, rice, sorghum, millet, cowpea and tamarind seeds were infested with 100 unsexed adults of S. linearis and observed to determine the suitability of the different substrates for the development of the weevil. Sitophilus linearis bred and multiplied on the tamarind seeds but not on the selected crop seeds in the laboratory. Mean developmental period on the tamarind seeds was 32 days. The highest number (51) of adults that emerged on the first day of emergence was from cultures set up with one-week old adult insects. The highest mean weight (3.9mg) was also recorded on the cultures set up with one-week old insects. However, both mean number of emerged adults and mean adult weight were not significantly different (P>0.05). A significant difference was recorded in the mean percentage survival period of S. linearis on the different substrates (P<0.05) with the longest survival recorded on tamarind seeds. It can therefore be concluded that Sitophilus linearis, though a member of the family of grain weevils, could not reproduce on the cereal substrates or the cowpea seeds presented to it in the laboratory. If further studies confirm these findings, then Sitophilus linearis may pose no threat to cereal production due to its inability to survive and reproduce on them.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus granarius, Sitophilus oryzae, Sitophilus zeamais},
	isbn = {1916-9671},
	author = {Adebayo, R. A. and Ayertey, J. N. and Cobblah, M. A.}
}
@article {5522,
	title = {Isolation and Identification of volatiles compounds from Rice Weeil Weevil , Sitophilus oryzae (coleptera Coleoptera : Curculionidae) in Iran with Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) and Headspace Chromatography},
	journal = {Annals of Biological Research},
	volume = {2},
	number = {6},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2011},
	pages = {528-531},
	abstract = {Rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L),cosmopolit Insect which today is scattered in all parts of the world .This pest often makes much damage on rice and other stored grains.Pesticides residue cause restriction use of these chemicals in some places such as warehouses and store locations. As Itegrated Pest Management is new strategy for pest control,Identification of specific volatiles compounds is necessary. Some studies have shown that pheromones compounds of a specific species could have some changes in different environments or nutritional conditions and this is effective at the efficacy of pheromones. This study were conducted to isolation and determination of volatile chemicals by SPME-HS Chromatography. Test Insects growed up in 27[plus or minus]1 Celsius degree temperature and 65[plus or minus]5 percent relative humidity. Volatile extraction were done in four different times duration with three replicates for each of them and virgin weevils used with median age 1-10 days after transferring them to sterile glass vials. SPME fibers contacted to head space of the vials then analyzed by (Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry(GC/MS) system. Detected compounds checked by Willy and NIST database software. Results showed 16 different compounds .most of them were similar with Detected compounds by other researchers but some of them were new. This difference may be for different geographical or nutritional condition, or may be for difference in extraction time. More study is needed for better determination and application of these compounds for IPM.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0976-1233},
	url = {http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/abr-vol2-iss6.html},
	author = {Hatami, Parisa and Imani, Sohrab and Larijani, Kambize}
}
@article {5511,
	title = {Effect of sorghum cultivars on population growth and grain damages by the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)},
	journal = {African Journal of Agricultural Research},
	volume = {3},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	month = {April},
	pages = {255-258},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {In northern Cameroon, the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a major pest of Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae) during storage. This staple crop is currently damaged by many insects and others pests during storage. To reduce the post-harvest losses due to S. oryzae, many control strategies are performed. An important step to achieve successful control is to isolate and characterize the noxious activity of rice weevil present on the sorghum variety currently stored. The present study shows that the two main ecotypes of S. bicolor, the "djiigari" ecotype is very susceptible to the 7 weevils strains isolated in the region. In a period of 100 days a single female of one of the most prolific strains produces 24 adults and more than 57\% of grains are attacked. In the "safraari" ecotype, the level of attack is very low. This suggests that efforts should be made to advice the farmers to prefer "safraari" ecotype in order to avoid post harvest losses due to S. oryzae.},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	url = {http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR/Archive.htm},
	author = {Ladang, Y. D. and Ngamo, L. T. S. and Ngassoum, M. B. and Mapongmestsem, P. M. and Hance, T.}
}
@article {5190,
	title = {Insecticidal activity of twenty plant powders on mortality, adult emergence of Sitophilus oryzae L. and grain weight loss in paddy},
	journal = {Journal of Biopesticides},
	volume = {2},
	number = {2},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	pages = {169-172},
	abstract = {Laboratory studies were conducted to study the effect of twenty plant powders (2 per cent) against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L (Colepotera: Curculionidae) infesting paddy grains. Among them Vitex negundo L. (Verbenaceae) was found to be significantly the best compared to other treatments. At two days after the treatment highest mortality was registered in Nelumbium speciosum Wild (Verbenaceae) (59.9\%) followed by Alpinia officinarum Hance (Zingiberaceae) (49.9\%), Azadirachta indica A.Juss (42.2\%) and by Glorisa superpa L. (Liliaceae) (30.8\%). At 7 days after the treatment, 99.1 per cent mortality was recorded in V. negundo followed by A. officinarum (96.6\%), N. speciosum (94.4\%) and in untreated control, 46.6 per cent mortality was observed. In another experiment, minimum adult emergence was registered in A. indica (18.00), A. officinarum (18.00), G. superpa (20.00), when compared to 98.00 adult weevils in untreated control. At 45th day after treatment grain weight loss was minimum (10.58\%) in A. indica compared to untreated control (39.21\%). At 60th days after treatment grain weight loss was minimum (13.01\%) in A. indica compared to untreated control (49.22 \%). At 90th day after treatment lowest grain weight loss was observed in A. indica (18.55\%) and highest grain weight loss was seen in C. halicacabum (40.80\%).},
	keywords = {Sitophilus oryzae},
	isbn = {0974-391X},
	url = {http://www.jbiopest.com/users/LW8/page.php?intPageId=199},
	author = {Govindan, K. and Nelson, S. Jeyarjan}
}
